ÇàÅÂÁÖÀÇÀÇ ÇÑ°è ¹× ±×¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ºñÆÇÀº ÇàÅÂÁÖÀÇÀÇ ÀüÁ¦°¡ µÇ´Â °æÇèÀû․¹æ¹ýÀÇ ÇÑ°è¿¡¼
ºñ·ÔµÇ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù.
The limitations of behaviorism and its criticism stem from the limitations of
empirical methods that are the premise of behaviorism.
°æÇèÀû ¹æ¹ýÀº ´Ù¾çÇÑ Çö»óµé °£ÀÇ °ü°è¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °¡¼³À» ü°èÀû, °æÇèÀû, ºñÆÇÀûÀ¸·Î Ž±¸ÇÑ´Ù.
The empirical method systematically, empirically, and critically explores the
hypotheses about the relationship between various phenomena.
±×·³À¸·Î½á »çÀ̺ñ °æÇè°úÇÐÀÇ ¿À·ù¿Í ±³Á¶ÁÖÀÇÀÇ µ¶´ÜÀ¸·ÎºÎÅÍ Á¤Ä¡ÇÐÀ» ÁöÄÑÁØ´Ù.
In doing so, it protects political science from the errors of pseudo-experiential science
and dogmatic dogma.
±×¸®°í ÂüµÈ Áø¸®¿¡ µµ´ÞÇÏ´Â °úÇÐÀû ¹æ¹ýÀ» Á¦½ÃÇÑ´Ù.
And it presents a scientific way to reach true truth.
±×·¯³ª °æÇèÀû ¹æ¹ýÀº ±â¼úÀû ¾î·Á¿òÀ̳ª ¿¬±¸»ó Á¦¾à»Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó °ËÁõ ºÒ°¡´ÉÇÑ °³³äÀû
ÀüÁ¦¸¦ ¹ÙÅÁÀ¸·Î ÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Ù.
However, the empirical method is based not only on technical difficulties or limitations
in research, but also on a conceptual premise that cannot be verified.
ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ Á¡¿¡¼ ÀÌ·ÐÀÇ °æÇèÀû °ËÁõ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ±Ã±ØÀû ÇØ´äÀ» ÁÖÁö ¸øÇÑ´Ù°í ºñÆǹ޴´Ù.
In this respect, it is criticized for failing to give the ultimate answer to the
empirical verification of the theory.
|